Newest Viewed Downloaded

Why need probabilistic approach? Rain probability How does that affect our behaviour?? ?

Summary of Common Results (Cont’d)

if X1 and X2 are N(m1, s1) and N(m2, s2) respectively  Z is N(mz, sz) where if X1 and X2 are s.i.  r12 = 0 if Xi = N(mi, si) ; i = 1 to n  Z is N(mz, sz) where

E4.8

S = D + L + W Column with capacity, R mD = 4.2 , sD = 0.3 , dD = 7% mL = 6.5 , sL = 0.8 , dL = 12% mW = 3.4 , sW = 0.7 , dW = 21% S = total load = D + L + W mS = mD + mL + mW = 14.1 sS = 0.32 + 0.82 + 0.72 =1.1 a) P(S > 18) = 1 – F = 1 – F(3.55) = 0.000193 Assume D, L, W are s.i.

E4.8 (Cont’d)

P(failure) = P(R < S) = P(R – S < 0) = P(X < 0) R = N(mR, dRmR) where mR = 1.5 mS = 1.5 x 14.1 = 21.15 dR = 0.15  R = N(21.15, 3.17) mX = -14.1 + 21.15 = 7.05 sX = 1.12 + 3.172 = 3.36 P(F) = F = F(-2.1) = 0.018 X = R – S mR – design capacity 1.5 – design safety factor, SF

Recall: mX = mR - 14.1 sX = (0.15mR)2 + 1.12  = F-1(0.001) = – 3.09   0.0225mR2+1.21 = 20.8 – 2.95mR + 0.105mR2  0.0825 mR2 – 2.95 mR +19.59 = 0 mR = 8.812 or 26.9 Set: P(F) = F = 0.001 Since mR should be larger than 21.5 mR = 26.9 Check mR = 8.812 P(F) = F = F(3.09)  1.0 If the target is P(F) = 0.001  mR = ? and assume dR = 0.15

or 1. Total weight = T = 2W Normal with mT = 2mW = 200 sT = 2sW = 40 Total weight = T = W1 + W2  Normal with mT = 200 sT = = = if s.i. and s1 = s2 = 20 2. ? T W = weight of a truck = N(100, 20) We are interested in the total weight of 2 trucks

E4.10

Sand Footing P S Sand Property – M Footing Property – B and I Assume P, B, I, and M are s.i. and log-normal with parameters lP, lB, lI, lM and zP, zB, zI, zM, respectively

Central Limit Theorem

S will approach a normal distribution regardless the individual probability distribution of Xi if N is large enough

Taylor Series Approximation

First order approximation: g(mX) g’(mX) (X – mX) X g(X) mX X mx - mx Var(X) …

Observe validity of linear approx depends on:

1) Function g is almost linear, i.e. small curvature 2) sx is small, i.e. distribution of X is narrow

Uses

1. Easy calculations 2. Compare relative contributions of uncertainties – allocation of resource 3. Combine individual contributions of uncertainties

Reliability Computation

Case 1: If R, S are normal where mZ = mS – mR and sZ = sS2 + sR2 Case 2: If R, S are lognormal where lZ = lS – lR and zZ = zS2 + zR2 Suppose R denotes resistance or capacity S denotes load or demand Satisfactory Performance = {S < R} PS = P(S < R) and Pf = 1 - PS

Case 3: If R is discrete, S is continuous Example on Case 3 S = N(5, 1) r P(R = r) 5 6 7 0.1 0.3 0.6

Reliability – Based Design

If b   PS   Reliability   b = Reliability index = F-1(PS)  Design mR = mS + bsS2 + sR2 b Observe for Case 1 in which R and S are both Normal

Example: S = N(5, 2) R = N(mR, 1) mR = ? Require Pf = 0.001 or PS = 0.999 b = F-1(0.999) = 3.1  Design mR = 5 + 3.122 + 12 = 11.93

Showing 81 - 94 of 94 items Details

Name: 
581
Author: 
cezll
Company: 
HKUST
Description: 
Why need probabilistic approach? Rain probability How does that affect our behaviour?? ?
Tags: 
and | distribution | probability | are | for | the | design | 100
Created: 
2/2/2005 2:20:12 AM
Slides: 
94
Views: 
0
Downloads: 
2
Rating: 
0


> Comment



Share this presentation
|

Comments

Share this presentation:

|
Sitemap