Newest Viewed Downloaded

Global nuclear structure aspects of tensor interaction Wojciech Satuła in collaboration with J.Dobaczewski, P. Olbratowski, M.Rafalski, T.R. Werner, R.A. Wyss, M.Zalewski Kazimierz Dolny 2008 + NNN + .... tens of MeV ab initio Principles of low-energy nuclear physics effective theories Coupling constants & fitting strategies Single-particle fingerprints of tensor interaction - SO splittings & magic gaps Influence of tensor fields on: - nuclear deformability - the total binding energy

Global nuclear structure aspects of tensor interaction Wojciech Satuła in collaboration with J.Dobaczewski, P. Olbratowski, M.Rafalski, T.R. Werner, R.A. Wyss, M.Zalewski Kazimierz Dolny 2008 + NNN + .... tens of MeV ab initio Principles of low-energy nuclear physics effective theories Coupling constants & fitting strategies Single-particle fingerprints of tensor interaction - SO splittings & magic gaps Influence of tensor fields on: - nuclear deformability - the total binding energy & S2n - high-spin (terminating) states Summary

Modern Mean-Field Theory º Energy Density Functional ® j, r, t, J, « ® T, ® s, ® F, Hohenberg-Kohn-Sham Effective theories for low-energy nuclear physics:

Fourier local correcting potential hierarchy of scales: 2roA1/3 ro ~ 2A1/3 is based on a simple and very intuitive assumption that low-energy nuclear theory is independent on high-energy dynamics ~ 10 The nuclear effective theory Long-range part of the NN interaction (must be treated exactly!!!) where regularization Coulomb ultraviolet cut-off denotes an arbitrary Dirac-delta model Gogny interaction przykład There exist an „infinite” number of equivalent realizations of effective theories

lim da a 0 Skyrme interaction - specific (local) realization of the nuclear effective interaction: spin-orbit density dependence 10(11) parameters Y | v(1,2) | Y Slater determinant (s.p. HF states are equivalent to the Kohn-Sham states) Spin-force inspired local energy density functional local energy density functional relative momenta spin exchange

Symmetric NM: - saturation density ( ~0.16fm-3) - energy per nucleon (-16 0.2MeV) - incompresibility modulus (210 20MeV) + - isoscalar effective mass (0.8) + Asymmetric NM: isovector effective mass (GDR sum-rule enhancement) - symmetry energy ( 30 2MeV) + neutron-matter EOS (Wiringa, Friedmann-Pandharipande) Finite, double-magic nuclei [masses,radii, rarely sp levels]: surface properties ZOO– 20 parameters are fitted to: density rg dependent CC Skyrme-inspired functional is a second order expansion in densities and currents: tensor spin-orbit

150 160 170 180 190 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 m*/m W0 SLy4 SLy5 SkP SkXc SkM* SIII SkO 5.5 6.5 7.5 8.5 140 150 160 170 180 190 experiment std. so 90% so SkP SkO SkXc SkM* MSk1 SLy5 SLy4 SkI1 SIII De(f7/2-f5/2) [MeV] W0 W0 120 130 140 150 160 170 De(d3/2-f7/2) [MeV] SkP SkM* SkXc SLy4 SkI1 SIII SkO MSk1 5 6 7 experiment * std. so 90% so scales with Wo (two-body SO interaction) Binding energy-dictated fit: superficial m* dependence in the spin-orbit strength: and contradicting scalings in the single-particle splittings scales with Wo* (Wo* = Wo) m mo *

Fitting strategies of the tensorial coupling constants (I) De(f5/2-f7/2) [MeV] 5 6 7 8 5 6 7 8 40Ca 48Ca 56Ni a) b) neutrons protons bare SkO spectra

SkPT T0=-39(*5);T1=-62(*-1.5);SO*0.8 C1 J C0 J 1 3 5 7 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 40Ca 1 3 5 7 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 56Ni f7/2-f5/2 p3/2-p1/2 f7/2-d3/2 2 4 6 8 -80 -60 -40 -20 0 f7/2-f5/2 f7/2-d3/2 from binding energies 48Ca f7/2-f5/2 f7/2-d3/2 f7/2-p3/2 p3/2-p1/2 Single-particle energies [MeV] Fitting strategies of the tensorial coupling constants (II) 1) Fit of the isoscalar SO strength 48Ca 56Ni 40Ca 2) Fit of the isoscalar tensor strength: 3) Fit of the isovector tensor strength or, more precisely, C1J/C1 j< j> F j> F j< - the details - D J 48Ni or 78Ni are needed in order to fix SO-tensor sector f7/2 f5/2 splittings around

OUR VALUES OF COUPLING CONSTANTS: -100 -50 0 50 -40 0 40 80 Colo BSF triangle C1 [MeV fm5] J Brink & C0 [MeV fm5] J SLy4 SkP SLy5 Skxc SkO’ MSk1 SkOT SLy4T SkPT Stancu Skxta Skxtb et al. C0∇J C0J C1J m* SLy4 SKO SKP SIII SkM* 0,69 0,90 1,00 0,76 0,67 -60 -45 -60 -62 -33 -92 -60 -38 -61 -58 -51 -65 -56 -42 -68 all CC are in [MeV fm5] „World” CC overview - strategy dependence - Colo et al. PLB646, 227 (2007) C0∇J C1∇J = 3 Standard: SkO: = -0,78 Brown et al. PRC74, 061303 (2006) Brink & Stancu, PRC75, 064311 (2007) unifikacja

M.Zalewski, J.Dobaczewski, WS, T.Werner, PRC77, 024316 (2008) Spin-orbit splittings [MeV] SLy4T T0=-45;T1=-60; SO*0.65 n 1h 1i f7/2-f5/2 g9/2-g7/2 1 3 5 7 1 3 5 7 16O 40Ca 48Ca 56Ni 90Zr 132Sn 208Pb p 1h f7/2-f5/2 g9/2-g7/2 16O 40Ca 48Ca 56Ni 90Zr 132Sn 208Pb SLy4T (I) spin-orbit splittings Selected single-particle fingerprints of tensor interaction:

2 4 6 8 10 p n SkP SkPT 8 20 28 50 82 126 56Ni p1/2 d5/2 f7/2 p3/2 g9/2 d5/2 f7/2 d3/2 g9/2 p1/2 8 20 28 40 50 82 48Ca p1/2 d5/2 d3/2 f7/2 f7/2 p3/2 g9/2 g7/2 g9/2 p1/2 h9/2 s1/2 Magic gaps [MeV] exp d3/2 f7/2 (II) magic-gap energies Selected single-particle fingerprints of tensor interaction: (III) „Otsuka mechanism”: Neutrons filling j>’ subshell influence proton s.p. energies: M.Zalewski et al., PRC77, 024316 (2008) Otsuka et al., PRL87, 082502 (2001); PRL95, 232502 (2005)

Z N 14 32 32 56 56 90 14 – d5/2 32 – f7/2 p3/2 56 – g9/2 d5/2 90 – h11/2 f7/2 total isoscalar Z N isoscvector Z N The tensorial „magic structure” N=Z

Z~14, N~32 Baumann et al. Nature Vol 449, 1022 (2007) 40Mg, 42Al Z~32 N~56 Z~56 N~90 known nuclei Tensor forces in neutron rich nuclei

SkOT’’: 1.00015C0r & 0.99C1r -2 -1 0 1 2 3 16O 40Ca 48Ca 56Ni 80Zr 90Zr 100Sn 132Sn 208Pb ETH – EEXP [MeV] E>0 SLy4 SkOT’ SkOT’’ 20 shells SkOT’: SO reduced by 15% C0J=-44.1MeVfm5 C1J=-91.6MeVfm5 -20 -15 -10 -5 0 5 40Ca 48Ca 56Ni 90Zr 132Sn 208Pb SLy4 SLy4T SLy4Tmin ETH – EEXP [MeV] M.Zalewski et al., PRC77, 024316 (2008)

5 6 7 8 5 6 7 8 40Ca 48Ca 56Ni 5 6 7 8 40Ca 48Ca 56Ni 5 6 7 8 5 6 7 8 5 6 7 8 De(nf5/2-nf7/2) [MeV] De(pf5/2-pf7/2) [MeV] bare Polarisation effects in a presence of strong tensor fields SkO versus SkOT’ time-even TE&TO

0 5 10 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 ( ( ) ) -2 -1 0 1 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 A S2n [MeV] dS2n [MeV] oxygen SkO SkOT’ AME03 d5/2 d3/2 s1/2 Influence of tensor on two-neutron separation energy in oxygen isotopes

Deformation properties in a presence of strong tensor fields

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 DE [MeV] tensor 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 spin-orbit deformacja b2 SkO SkOTX SkOT’ f7/2 f5/2 p3/2 neutrons protons 4p-4h [303]7/2 [321]1/2 Nilsson -6 -5 -4 -3 DEtensor [MeV] 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 b2 Rudolph et al. PRL82, 3763 (1999)

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 SkO SkOTX tensor SkOT’ spin-orbit DE [MeV] b2 80Zr constrained HFB calculations in spin-saturated 80Zr

DE = f7/2 n Imax E( ) E( ) - d3/2 f7/2 n+1 Imax -1 Further tests in simple-situations: terminating states around A~50: across the gap 46Ti24 protons neutrons +3/2 +1/2 -1/2 -3/2 +7/2 +5/2 +3/2 +1/2 -1/2 -3/2 -5/2 -7/2 p-h +3h (n=7) f7/2 d3/2 -1 0h 14h f7/2 +3/2 +1/2 -1/2 -3/2 d3/2 +7/2 +5/2 +3/2 +1/2 -1/2 -3/2 -5/2 -7/2 partially f7/2 (n=6) 20 filled filled fully 28 cranking: -wjz PRC71, 024305 (2005) H.Zduńczuk, W.Satuła, R.Wyss

Showing 1 - 20 of 24 items Details

Name: 
Satula_K08
Author: 
wojtek satula
Company: 
Wydział Fizyki UW
Description: 
Global nuclear structure aspects of tensor interaction Wojciech Satuła in collaboration with J.Dobaczewski, P. Olbratowski, M.Rafalski, T.R. Werner, R.A. Wyss, M.Zalewski Kazimierz Dolny 2008 + NNN + .... tens of MeV ab initio Principles of low-energy nuclear physics effective theories Coupling constants & fitting strategies Single-particle fingerprints of tensor interaction - SO splittings & magic gaps Influence of tensor fields on: - nuclear deformability - the total binding energy
Tags: 
tensor | mev | energi | spin | sko | interact | fit | skot
Created: 
6/7/2005 7:12:53 AM
Slides: 
24
Views: 
1
Downloads: 
0
Rating: 
0


> Comment



Share this presentation
|

Comments

Share this presentation:

|
Sitemap