Newest Viewed Downloaded

B-Factories: Physics Reach Luminosity CPV and CKM Rare B decays ConclusionsLivio Lanceri – Univ. and INFN Trieste INFN-CSNI – LNF, February 4, 2003

B-Factories: Physics Reach Luminosity CPV and CKM Rare B decays Conclusions

Livio Lanceri – Univ. and INFN Trieste INFN-CSNI – LNF, February 4, 2003

Discovery potential at the B factories

CKM and Unitarity Triangle SM predicts a pattern of CPV, from phase in the CKM matrix B factories can measure both angles and sides of the Unitarity Triangle New phases from New Physics may reshape the UT Rare B Decays CKM suppressed (tree b  u), Radiative Penguins (QCD, EM, EW), leptonic B decays Common feature (Penguins, leptonic): New Physics signatures from rates and asymmetries (new virtual particles in the loops) Charm, tau Examples: D mixing and lepton number violating  decays Very small in SM  windows for New Physics

Experimental ingredients

z(CP) z(tag) Inclusive tag (lepton, K, …): tag(1-2w)2  28% rec  1540% (Exclusive tag: tag  0.10.2%) < z >  260 m z (RMS)  190 m Asymmetric B factories optimized for measurements of time-dependent CP violating asymmetries OK also for other measurements (rare B decays, …) Open trigger! No B physics losses at trigger level High efficiencies, small bkgd Unique tool at B factories: exclusive B tagging with fully rec. B (“single B beam”) Luminosity is a key factor

B-Factories: experiments and luminosity

c.f. integrated luminosity for Argus (1983-1987): ~100 pb-1 CLEO (1981-2000): ~16 fb-1 BABAR/PEP-II Record peak luminosity: 4.6 x 1033cm-2s-1 (~5 BB/s) max lumi/24h: 303 pb-1 total recorded lumi to date: ~0.1 ab-1 (~10% off-peak) Restarted end Nov.2002 after 4 months shutdown (Forward IFR upgrade) Belle/KEK-B Record peak luminosity: 8.2 x 1033cm-2s-1 (~8 BB/s) max lumi/24h: 433 pb-1 total recorded lumi to date: ~0.1 ab-1 (~10% off-peak) Restarted in January 2003 after vacuum loss forced stop in December

PEP-II without upgrades

0.5 ab-1 2006 1.6 x 1034 integrated peak 2009 1.1 ab-1

PEP-II upgrade scenarios

NO (Super-KEKB?) SuperPEP/SuperBaBar Year 20...? New collider, (and new detector…) Snowmass: 370M$ Minimal upgrade Feasible from 2005 Shut-down  3 months 0.40.5 ab-1/year Limited cost 2ab-1 in 2009 From J.Seeman/SLAC

Path to higher PEP-II luminosity

Luminosity 4.6E33 1E34 2E34 4E34 Units I+ 1800 2700 3600 4500 mA I- 950 1400 1760 2000 mA Beta y* 11.5 9 7 4.5 mm Beta x* 50 50 50 50 cm Bunch Length 1.3 1.0 0.8 0.5 cm # bunches 792 1300 1500 1600 Vert. Emitt. 2.5 1.4 1.1 0.7 nm Horiz. Emittance 40/50 30/45 32/47 40/48 nm (+/-) Crossing angle 0 0 0 ~+/-8 mrad Tune shifts (x/y) 7.5/4.5 8.0/5.7 8.2/6.0 8.4/6.3 x100 Number RF stations 7 10 13 15 Date hardware ready Jan 02 Dec 02 Dec 04 Nov 05 Date for luminosity Jun 02 July 03 Dec 05 Dec 06 (J.Seeman, BaBar Collaboration meeting, Sept.2002)

BaBar Long Term Planning TF

For the 4x1034 PEP-II upgrade: We studied the physics reach in some channels for: 0.5 ab-1 (2006), 2.0 ab-1 (end of the decade) And: Interest/need of an accompanying BaBar detector upgrade ? (Conclusion: only Barrel IFR) Most extrapolations reported here come from the preliminary report of the TF

What about KEK-B/Belle upgrades ?

EoI (January 2002): Super KEK-B, L = 1035cm-2s-1 - LER: e- , I = 10A; HER: e+, I = 3A Linac upgrade (e-  e+) - Vacuum system (ante chambers); RF system (52 cavities, 12SC) - 15 mrad crossing, final focussing Total cost (KEK-B + Belle):  400 M$ EoI preliminary plan: Present plans: … ?? Workshop at KEK, Feb.2003

CPV and CKM: phases sin2 sin2 

CPV in mixing-decay interference direct CPV dN exp(–|Dt|/tB) ( 1 ± D (S sin(DmDt) - C cos(DmDt)) )  R CP asymmetry: Time Dependence Amplitude ratio B0fcp/B0fcp CP eigenvalue B mixing Measured from data (Flavour sample)! D mis-tag dilution R time resolution Flavour tag

BaBar, sin2b: results

sin2b = 0.741  0.067  0.034 sin2b = 0.755  0.074 sin2b = 0.723  0.158 Charmonium modes Modes with Penguins Yield in Standard Model on-peak: 81.9 fb-1 off-peak: 9.6 fb-1  89 M BB pairs tagged CP sample: 2631 flavor sample: 25375 (pure Penguin!)

BaBar, sin2b: systematics

0.034 Total 0.003 Dmd 0.004 B lifetime 0.010 Fit bias correction 0.012 Signal Dilutions 0.017 Dt meas. and RF 0.015 Klong BG 0.017 0.008 CP and Mix BG DCS decays, tag side dsin2b Source 0.004 0.008 0.003 0.010 0.010 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.018 Asymptotic Using only lepton tags: 0.01 decays with charmonium:

sin2b: projected errors (BaBar)

Extrapolated statistical and systematic uncertainties Statistical uncertainty For “golden” modes only

sin2eff from B0+- b d d u d u p+ p- B0 Mixing + T: b+g b d d d u u p- p+ t B0 P: -b,d Observables in +- CP asymmetry (time-dependent) Extra weak phase –b, strong phase d, and |P/T|, modify a by k : from isospin analysis

BaBar and Belle: Spp and Cpp

With incomplete information (no isospin analysis): Measure Spp and Cpp from both sinDmDt and cosDmDt terms . Compare with predicted Spp and Cpp values for given a, b, |P/T|, and d. Assume for instance: cf. Gronau and Rosner, Phys. Rev. D65, 093012 (2002) BABAR Belle 1 Belle 2

Results and extrapolations for sin2eff

Extrapolated errors (BaBar) Results (0.08 ab-1)

sin2: isospin analysis (Gronau & London)

BR (10-6) B0 → p+p0 B0 → p0p0 A Yield Mode Need flavor tagged rates for +-, 0, 00 BaBar:

Upper bounds on = 2eff-2

Grossman-Quinn bound: BaBar, present data: BaBar, extrapolations: vs BF(00), at fixed Luminosity Small gain with lumi Most powerful at small BF

Isospin analysis: projections - 1

L = 0.5 ab-1 L = 2.0 ab-1 BR(B`gp` p0) = 4.1x10-6 BR(B0gp+ p-) = BR(B0gp+ p-) = 4.7x10-6 NB: 4-fold ambiguity ! = 2.0x10-6   Sensitivity to  : toy MC with BaBar detector Assumptions (example):

Showing 1 - 20 of 55 items Details

Name: 
lanceri_b_factories
Author: 
I.N.F.N.
Company: 
TRIESTE
Description: 
B-Factories: Physics Reach Luminosity CPV and CKM Rare B decays ConclusionsLivio Lanceri – Univ. and INFN Trieste INFN-CSNI – LNF, February 4, 2003
Tags: 
babar | tag | decay | penguin | event | analysi | luminos | sensit
Created: 
11/15/1998 6:17:08 PM
Slides: 
55
Views: 
1
Downloads: 
0
Rating: 
0


> Comment



Share this presentation
|

Comments

Share this presentation:

|
Sitemap